STUDI KOMPARATIF : PERAWATAN LUKA KONVENSIONAL DAN MODERN DI BEKASI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33992/jgk.v11i2.636Keywords:
Wound Care, Conventional, ModernAbstract
This comparative research study compares conventional and modern wound care. The purpose of this study was to improve patient experience, comfort level, family expectations, and system support in using conventional and modern wound care models. This study uses a comparative design. Data collection was done by in-depth interviews (in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation studies. Verbatim results were analyzed by the Colaizzi method. The study took place from August to October 2014. Determination of participants with case design groups of 5 participants from participants who used modern wound care models and 5 participants from participants who used conventional wound care models The theme of the research found was the experience of informants carrying out conventional and modern wound care, the comfort level of informants doing conventional and modern wound care, the expectations of the informant's family doing conventional and modern wound care, and supporting systems (supporting family) informants carry out conventional and modern wound care.
Â
References
WHO. Jumlah Penderita Diabetes Dunia. 2012Di unduh darihttp://www.who.int/whr/1997/media_centre/executive_summary1/en/index10.html pada tanggal 11 juni 2014
Smeltzer, S. C. Keperawatan Medikal Bedah, Brunner & Suddarth. Edisi 12. EGC: Jakarta. 2018
Nolan.Faktor penyebab diabetes. 2012. Di unduh dari www.pdpersi.co.idpada tanggal 13 juni 2014
International Diabetes Federation,. What is diabetes? 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.idf.org/aboutdiabetes/what-is-diabetes.html
Waspadji, S., Sukardji, K & Octarina, M. Pedoman Diet Diabetes Mellitus; sebagai Panduan bagi Dietisien/Ahli Gizi, Dokter, Mahasiswa dan Petugas Kesehatan lain. Jakarta : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia.2007
Nurachmah, Kristianto, danGayatri. Aspek Kenyamanan Pasien Luka Kronik Ditinjau Dari Tansforming Growth Factor Î’1 dan kadar Kortisol.Makalah Kesehatan. 2011 Vol. 15, No. 2: 73-80
Maryunani. Perawatan Luka Modern (Modern Woundcare) Terkini dan Terlengkap. Jakarta : In Media.2013
Edwards, R. and Harding, G. Bacteria and Wound Healing. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 2004. 17, 91-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001432-200404000-00004
Singhal A, Reis ED, Kerstein MD. Option For Nonsurgical debridement of necrotic wounds. Advanced skin wound care. 2001. 14(2): 96-100
Slachta, P.A. Caring for chronic wounds: A Knowledge update.2012 Retrieved From. www.WoundcareAdvidsor.com
Irma. Konsep Dasar Manajemen Perawatan Luka. Jakarta : EGC. 2014
Lumenta, Benjamin.Pelayanan Medis Citra, Konflik dan Harapan. Penerbit Kanisius. Yogyakarta. 1989
Kristianto. Perbandingan perawatan luka teknik modern dan konvensional terhadap transforming growth faktor Beta 1 dan respon nyeri pada pasien diabetes mellitus. Jakarta : FIK Universitas Indonesia. 2010
Dealey, C. The factors that influence patients’ choice of hospital and treatment. British journal of nursing. 2005. 14(10): 576-579
Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S.C. Positive psychology: The scientific and practical explorations of human strengths. New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc. 2007
Landy, Frank J. & Jeffrey M. Conte. Work in the 21st Century : An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology (fourth edition). United States of America: JohnWiley & Sons Inc. 2007
Veiel, H. O. F., & Baumann, U. The Meaning and measurement of social support. New York: Hemisphere Pub. Corp. 1992
Sarafino, E.P. Health psychology: Biopsychological Interactions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1994
Sarafino, E.P. Health psychology: Biopsychological Interactions New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.1998
World Health Organisation. Diabetes mellitus. 2010. Di unduh dari www.depkes.go.id pada tanggal 01 juli 2014
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits others to share the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), provided that the original publication in this journal is acknowledged.
Authors are also permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (see the Open Access Effect).
